Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU

AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU +1185%
8.294 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2023
FirePro
Generation
Console GPU(ASUS)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
-

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2700 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.59 TFLOPS
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
518.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Phoenix
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
25.39 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
178 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy