Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal

AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
TITAN X Pascal +1600%
10.97 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
28
512
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GP102
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy