Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9650M GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock900MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4190M +763%
0.691 TFLOPS
GeForce 9650M GS
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Mar 2008
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
900 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
32
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
29W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GS1-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy