Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4190M vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

AMD FirePro W4190M vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M and 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 83% (1650MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
Iris Xe MAX Graphics +266%
2.534 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Oct 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.60 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
79.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.069 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.534 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
633.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
DG1
-
-
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
Unknown
77 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy