Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4190M vs AMD Radeon RX 7900M

AMD FirePro W4190M vs AMD Radeon RX 7900M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7900M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 132% (2090MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7900M +5474%
38.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Oct 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Navi Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1825 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
2090 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
72
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
4608
24
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
401.3 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
601.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
77.05 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.52 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1204 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
180W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy