Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation

AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M and 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 125% (2025MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation +1100%
8.294 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
2025 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.80 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.294 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy