Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD FirePro S9000

AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD FirePro S9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
FirePro S9000 +125%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Aug 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Tahiti
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy