Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD FirePro W9100

AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100 +266%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Hawaii
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy