Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 170W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock980MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM +84%
2.634 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Sep 2013
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1344
48
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.44 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
109.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.634 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
109.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
170W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
GK104
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy