Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5000 vs Intel Arc A310

AMD FirePro W5000 vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5000
1.267 TFLOPS
Arc A310 +112%
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
DG2-128
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy