Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9650M GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M +1963%
1.651 TFLOPS
GeForce 9650M GS
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Mar 2008
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
32
48
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
G84
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
NB9P-GS1-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
29W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy