AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+48%
2.458 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
FirePro W6150M
1452
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+116%
3150
Graphics Card
Nov 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Emerald
GPU Name
TU117
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
