Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W

AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 25W to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
GeForce MX450 25W
1.667 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Aug 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.76 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.08 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.333 TFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.667 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.08 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
TU117
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
N18S-G5
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy