Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

AMD FirePro W6150M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M +4486%
1.651 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
0.036 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro Mobile
Generation
M7x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.800 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
36.00 GFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
M72
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
M72-S (216QSAKA12FG)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy