Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6300M +89%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
32bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
Navi 24
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy