Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon R7 M265

AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon R7 M265

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 M265 's Advantages
Boost Clock825MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M +160%
1.651 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M265
0.633 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jan 2014
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
6
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
Opal
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Opal XT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy