Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X

AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M265X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 M265X 's Advantages
Boost Clock625MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M +106%
1.651 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M265X
0.8 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
625 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
800.0 GFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
Venus
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Venus PRO (216-0846009)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy