Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6170M vs AMD FirePro W6150M

AMD FirePro W6170M vs AMD FirePro W6150M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6170M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M +19%
1.971 TFLOPS
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
12
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
Emerald
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy