Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6170M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

AMD FirePro W6170M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1755MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile +355%
8.986 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1455 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1755 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
896
Shading Units
2560
56
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.24 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
140.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.986 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.986 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
140.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
AD107
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
GN21-X2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy