Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6170M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

AMD FirePro W6170M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +51%
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
Amethyst
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
5 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy