Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7170M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

AMD FirePro W7170M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7170M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7170M 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Boost Clock975MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (80W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7170M +48%
2.961 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition
1.997 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2015
Release Date
Nov 2014
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
975 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
92.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
62.40 GTexel/s
2.961 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.961 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.997 TFLOPS
185.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Amethyst XT GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy