Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

AMD FirePro W8000 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000 +6620%
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2009
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.336GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
40
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.376 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.52 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
25W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV620
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV620 LE
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy