Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

AMD FirePro W8100 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
Lower TDP (175W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100
4.219 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590 +68%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Nov 2018
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
2304
160
TMUs
144
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.44 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.119 TFLOPS
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
445.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
175W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Polaris 30
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
Polaris 30 XT (215-0922006)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy