Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

AMD FirePro W8100 vs AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (220W vs 263W)
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2430MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100
4.219 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7800 XT +784%
37.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
3840
160
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
583.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
74.65 TFLOPS
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
37.32 TFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1166 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
263W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 3x DisplayPort 2.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 32
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
Navi 32 XT (215-180000006)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy