Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI FirePro V4900

AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1568 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +420%
3.994 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2011
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
480
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

274W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Turks
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy