Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI FirePro V7750

AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI FirePro V7750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (76W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +680%
3.994 TFLOPS
FirePro V7750
0.512 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2009
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
320
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
512.0 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

274W
TDP
76W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV730
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
RV730 GL XTX
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy