Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 274W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2004
FirePro
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

274W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 4x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
NV41
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy