Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD FireStream 9350

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +98%
3.994 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2010
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1440
128
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cypress
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy