Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
1952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +1454%
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
2048
Shading Units
96
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

274W
TDP
69W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT215
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy