Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +476%
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
0.693 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2013
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.216 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
692.7 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.86 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GK208
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
GK208-301-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy