Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5700X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (205W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700X +161%
10.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2019
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1243 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
2560
128
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.6 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
326.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.89 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.44 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
652.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
205W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 10
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy