Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
1808 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +464%
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
240
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT200B
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

274W
TDP
204W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy