Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon X1050

AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon X1050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 274W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R400 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
200 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3.200GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

274W
TDP
24W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV410
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
110 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.12 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
156 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy