Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (274W vs 300W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Boost Clock1019MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +27%
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 690
3.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1536
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.61 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.130 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
130.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GK104
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
GK104-355-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy