Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2070 +86%
7.465 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2018
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
2048
Shading Units
2304
128
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
103.7 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
233.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.93 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.465 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
233.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
175W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU106
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
TU106-400A-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy