Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 980 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 224.4GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1216MHz
Lower TDP (165W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 980 +24%
4.981 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2014
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1127 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1216 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.4GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
2048
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.82 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
155.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.981 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
155.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
165W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GM204
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
GM204-400-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy