Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon R9 270X

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon R9 270X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 270X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (180W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +48%
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270X
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1280
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
84.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
168.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
180W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Curacao
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Curacao XT (215-0848004)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy