Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
PG506 242 +158%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
56
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
3584
128
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GA100
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

274W
TDP
165W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy