Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +1980%
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jul 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
3
2048
Shading Units
120
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV630
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

274W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
4x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy