Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
1328 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 5750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (86W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +296%
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5750
1.008 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2009
FirePro
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
9
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
720
128
TMUs
36
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1008 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

274W
TDP
86W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Juniper
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Juniper LE (215-0754009)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy