Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V520 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V520 +84%
7.373 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2020
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
2304
128
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.4 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.75 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.373 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
460.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 12
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 12
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
Unknown
352 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy