Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI FirePro V9800

AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +46%
3.994 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1600
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cypress
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy