Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

274W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV530
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy