Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

AMD FirePro W9000 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +265%
3.994 TFLOPS
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU117
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy