Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9100 vs ATI FirePro V9800

AMD FirePro W9100 vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100 +92%
5.238 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Sep 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1600
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Cypress
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy