Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9100 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

AMD FirePro W9100 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
Lower TDP (85W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100 +24%
5.238 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Aug 2020
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1280
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
85W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 14
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy