Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9100 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

AMD FirePro W9100 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100 +630%
5.238 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
512
176
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
55W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy