Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210 +2264%
11.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2020
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
555 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1147 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
80
320
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
146.8 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.49 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.75 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.873 TFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.0
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy