Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170 +218%
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Oct 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
320
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

105W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
G94B
-
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy