Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
248 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (43W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170 +164%
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Feb 2010
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
320
Shading Units
72
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

105W
TDP
43W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy